Crapshoot

In class this week we digitized what footage we managed to collect--you know, the footage with NO SOUND. With all the groups trying to digitize at once, we ended up waiting a while for our clips to be finished. I was hoping by this point to be able to begin editing, but some major scheduling and film storyline issues have prevented us from even filming a solid chunk of our movie. Even though we did manage to shoot about three minutes of the new storyline last week, we decided to re-shoot it because it seemed too chaotic with all of us yelling and arguing.

My group talked a bit about our plans for shooting while we were waiting on the footage to be digitized, and we made yet another plan. I volunteered to write out a brief guideline of the script (with suggested lines and shots) for the new storyline and then send everyone a copy for approval. And since we were able to snatch the camera for a week, Sam and Tommy said they would film over the weekend. Also, both Lynn and Katie said they would help in any way they could with the filming process (since they, and I, are all editors there really isn't a lot to do until the filming is complete). Even though, we didn't get a lot finished during class time last week, I think we all left feeling a little better at least knowing that we had a plan.

However, now it is Tuesday and we still have not filmed anything. A series of avoidable problems got in the way of filming this past weekend, such as not knowing where the camera is and scheduling conflicts. Lynn, Katie, and I all, independently, decided that since we were having so much trouble finding a time when we could all meet together to film that we would let Sam and Tommy take over the actual shooting. That way, there are only two schedules to deal with and work around (well, along with the actor's schedules) instead of five. Also, some other film groups mentioned that all group members were not needed on set; filming went smoother and quicker when there were fewer schedules to work around.

So, as of right now, I'm stressed about the film. I don't know when the filming will take place and I'm almost to the point of picking up the camera myself and figuring out how to work it. In saying all this, I'm not particularly worried about the film being finished, I'm just worried about the quality of the product and the unnecessary stress involved with completing it on time. Being an editor, my work begins with the raw clips, and now with just a week to go, I'm not sure how much I can get finished. Lynn also being an editor helps relieve some of the pressure, but I still can't wrap my head around not having ANYTHING to start editing yet. While other groups are thinking about soundtracks and effects, our group has yet to even shoot!

One good thing about being the editor as well as writing the script (even if it is just a basic script) is the fact that I can visualize the film in my head. I know the shot sequences and effects I want with certain scenes (and several quick options for each idea to allow for other group member's input). I think that since I have an idea of where the film will go, then the editing process should go relatively smooth. It's just a matter of getting the variety of shots, the right actors to nail the characters, the little logistical requirements (the props and camera shots), and simply enough footage to work with in order to complete the film and call it a success.

So, here's where we are at the moment:
-Sam and Tommy have free-reign over filming...as long as it is finished before Thursday at class time (so we can digitize). Supposedly, they will film tomorrow. Since I am free tomorrow I told them that I will help in any way they need me to. I expect to help more behind the camera (guiding the shots through the vision in my head) than in front, especially since Sam (the director) will be serving as one of our main comedic actors in the film.

Meanwhile, Lynn, Katie, and I are awaiting the digitized footage impatiently so we can fulfill our group roles. Lynn and I will edit the footage while Katie will edit the sound.

Things need to start falling into place...soon.

Brief but productive

This past week in film class, we met for a short while but achieved a lot. Katie and I laid out the basic plot structure for the new idea and bullet-pointed the key issues within the film. We also bounced around the idea of writing up character "identities" in which we type up a background for each character in our film (based upon us, since we are the filmmakers and our film is about filmmakers). Then the idea was to give the background to each person in our group as a basis for which qualities to highlight. I've found that after two completed, unused screenplays, our group works best with guidelines rather than exact instructions (as far as dialogue goes anyway). As far as the setting, we plan to shoot the rest of our film in a dorm room with the four of us (everyone beside Tommy, who will be running the camera) serving as the main actors. A large portion of our movie will be filmed in a dorm room since the main focus is the sequence of events that occur during the idea process of making a movie (highlighting the stress and irritation involved) and not exactly about where it is that the characters are/go.

After we finished laying out the structure of the film we scheduled the next film shooting and then second checked our ideas (as far plot layout and settings) with everyone in the group. With everyone’s approval on the details of the film, I think the pick-up shot days will go smoothly (especially in comparison to last week). While there is still a lot of work to be completed and the filming process has been slow, the rest of the process should be very productive now that we have a concrete idea and excitement surrounding it.

Try to keep up

Last week was the first week in which Donna and Eric handed the class period over to us and told us to “Do with it what you will”--however in not quite those exact words. We were to work in our groups doing whatever it is that we need to get done. Here's what went down:

Sam (our director) and Tommy (our cameraman) were filming on a nearby mountain with a few people they gathered to serve as our actors in the film. This left myself, Katie, and Lynn to meet in the classroom and group together all the things we needed (the skull, cheese grater, clown make-up, and a guitar...you know, the usual) and then meet them on the mountain. After about 15 minutes, we were in the car driving towards the location. We called Tommy to get directions but he told us that they were leaving. All three of us, confused and frustrated since this was the first day we had been able to shoot (and the only day we would have) turned around to meet them somewhere close-by.
We met Sam, Tommy, and four guys (whom we do not know) at a gas station to regroup and see what the hell was going on. Tommy said that they had to drop the actors off at campus because they had prior commitments. We (the girls of the group), still confused about how we were to film with no actors if we drop them off, follow them back to campus.

When we arrive, we get out of the car to talk to Sam and Tommy. At this point, we’re all so frustrated and tense that we all begin to get very short with each other. After an awkward few minutes with us griping back and forth, and the actors sitting in the back seat of the car, the actors leave and we choose to meet back up on the other side of campus.

When we get there, we all decide to think of a different film idea since we do not have our actors or enough time to film our screenplay-ed idea. So, basically, we started over...again. After standing in the parking lot for about ten minutes talking quietly (and carefully--I think everyone was afraid to be the first to erupt the stress-volcano that was boiling inside each of us) we drive back to the dorm to reconvene in Sam's room. At this point in the night, I felt defeated. I was worried about finishing on time, having enough shots to edit, and the overall quality of the product. I think the same things were running through everyone else's minds too. We were all getting a little frantic…well except Tommy. He seemed relatively calm throughout, thank goodness.

[This next part is the kicker]

We talked for a little bit in Sam’s room before deciding to watch the footage they collected on the mountain. The camera is connected to the television and after finding the remote control, we begin the playback. It's silent. "Silent" as in there was no sound coming from the TV. The film was playing, and the cords were hooked up correctly, but there was NO SOUND. We tried not to the think the worst as we flipped switches, turned knobs, and adjusted settings on the camera in the hope of hearing something. Katie called her sister, who deduced that we had in fact, not recorded sound with the footage.

You can imagine our disappointment.

However, we didn't get angry. No sense in getting worked up when all you have to do is fix the problem and move on. We immediately began to brainstorm new ideas for our film. After about twenty minutes (and a few chucked ideas, including the proposed re-adoption of our very very first screenplay)we came up with a simple, yet funny (we believe anyway), idea in which we all had lots of personal experience.

We are going to film the process of making a student film. Specifically, we are going to film our experiences that night in class. I'm excited about our idea; I think it has lots of potential. Everyone in the group seems to be on board with the new idea and even a little excited. I'm just glad that we've all come to consensus on what is funny. After recapping the night's activities we all agreed that that particular three hours on a Thursday night was a little funny, if very irritating at times. If anything I was glad to see everyone leave in a little better mood then in which they came. I'm optimistic and ready to edit.

Now we just have to make sure that we record sound as well as film next time.

Adaptation

This past week we watched Adaptation by Spike Jonze. I think I enjoyed this film more than any other movie we’ve watched this semester. I was definitely the most excited about it because Charlie Kaufman was one of the writers for the movie (he’s a favorite of mine). The intricately designed screenplay is genius in the way it weaves together reality (what the audience is watching) and the movie reality (what the characters experience).

In the beginning of the movie I wasn’t exactly where the story within the movie began and the making of the movie ended. The ideas Kaufman (played by Nicholas Cage) had during the writing process where included in the movie—even the ideas he discarded. We, the audience, saw every idea that the character Kaufman envisioned as if we were the ones watching his (the character’s) movie. The screenplay blurs the lines between the story within the movie (played by actors) and reality (Nicholas Cage plays Charlie Kaufman, one of the actual writers of Adaptation for example).

The film plays with the ideas of uniqueness and connectedness—between the orchids as well as the characters. McKee’s comments to Charlie on change emphasize human connectedness in that we (he says “character” because he’s giving advice on writing a screenplay but the same idea exists in reality) all change. We all change in a different way and it comes from within us (“comes from them [characters]” as McKee says). However, in this ability to adapt or change we are all connected. The only thing we all have in common is our uniqueness. I think the rarity and uniqueness of the orchids emphasize the idea of connectedness through uniqueness. With this idea in mind, one of the most interesting aspects of Adaptation is the inclusion of a twin brother to Nicholas Cage’s character. Charlie “shares DNA” with his twin brother. They are genetically identical (and physically identical). By DNA, they are the same person—Charlie would seem to be robbed of his uniqueness, his individuality. However, the experiences shape him into a different person than his brother. Change makes them two different people. The rivalry between the two brothers offers a funny and interesting twist to the idea of them being the same genetic being yet completely different people. In the end, Kaufman realizes that he has the power to change himself and with that new power he can “take hold of the movie-ness and change himself” (the character that plays him) within the movie into anyone he wants (as Donna put it).

I think the play between uniqueness and connectedness resonates with a lot of people in that we all have moments in which we question our special-ness as well as our sense of belonging. We seem to want both qualities all at once and the boundary between the two is constantly shifting.

The last bit of the movie (after the meeting with McKee) was packed with events. There was a car chase, an on-foot chase through the jungle, a gun fight, drugs, sex, a crocodile attack…so much as to make you want to laugh because of the sensationalism (just as the filmmakers wanted). The whole movie up to the point in which Charlie meets McKee, Charlie tries to adapt the book The Orchid Thief to a screenplay—an impossible feat because “nothing much happens” in the book. In that impossibility of making a movie about just pure thoughts (not an actual story as in The Orchid Thief), is where the sensationalized ending comes in to “save” the movie. The movie in which “nothing much happens” now turns into a movie in which a lot of things happen, however unrealistic. By the cop out Charlie Kaufman (the character) takes in writing his screenplay, he says that movies need that “FLASH! BANG!” ending to work. Also, by including the over-done ending in Adaptation, the question of whether movies need sensationalized endings to be successful is posed to the audience.

The intertwining and weaving together of stories and ideas is what makes the film both brilliant and slightly difficult to talk about.

From the source

This week in class we watched a student film from our own college entitled "The Last Summer” by Corey Womack. He didn't tell us beforehand that it was based on the events and feelings he felt the summer before leaving for college, but from the nostalgic tone of the film I gathered that it was more than just a story he came up with one day. The main plot was of a high school graduate stuck between the need to leave the town he grew up in and the things (like his girlfriend and just fear of what is to come) that keep him from being excited to leave.

I liked his take on the home town atmosphere. I find that some teen movies in which the main character has the opportunity to leave his/her small hometown are over exaggerated and degrading to the small hometown. While I think Corey’s film definitely had that sense of limitation that comes with unrealized potential and unsatisfied ambition, I don’t think it was overly critical of the small town atmosphere. In fact, the film seems to emphasize that the main character appreciates all the things his home has given him—the decision to move away to college is just the next step in becoming who he is. I appreciated Corey’s attention to detail, especially when conveying the emotions the character feels throughout the movie. The screen frame closing in on the main character emphasizing the suffocation he feels adds a lot to the tone and depth of the film.

Hearing Corey speak about the decisions he made in the film making process after seeing the finished product really helped me connect the idea of creating a film as a creative, artistic expression of emotion. While all the movies we’ve watched this semester had that artistic quality that makes them unique, I especially felt the emotional pull between Corey and his film. Maybe there is just something to be said for being in the same room as the filmmaker as he/she talks about their creation—you can see and feel the connection between the person and the product. I wonder if Corey was even the slightest bit nervous at showing his film. I’m sure he was more relieved to be finished (as he kept reiterating that he was finished editing and that we were seeing the final version) than nervous, but I considered his film to be a very personal form of expression (especially since it was autobiographical).

One other thing that interested me in class was this little clip we watched of Alfred Hitchcock talking about tension in movies. He spent a few minutes setting up a scene for us (I say that as if he were in the room with us) to make the distinction between surprise and suspense. He described the two as: “When you show a group of characters talking and a bomb goes off, that's surprise; when you tell the audience there's a bomb and then show the characters talking, that's suspense.” The most interesting part of the clip was when Hitchcock stated that the most important thing to remember is that “the bomb must never go off.” I wondered at the reason behind never “completing the bomb sequence” (never allowing the tension to release perhaps in a metaphorical sense).

I wondered what would happen if you did let the bomb go off. Then I realized that that was just it. The bomb would go off. And there would be nothing. No story, no characters, no purpose—you negated it by destroying everything you built up to that point. I am reminded of the MacGruber Saturday Night Live skits (spoofs of MacGyver)in which the bomb ALWAYS goes off despite MacGruber’s efforts to disable it…so funny. However, in every movie I’ve seen with a bomb problem, the bomb never (or if it does, it does so in a continuation of the story and not the end) actually goes off. I always wondered why this was so prevalent in movies. Then, Hitchcock explained his reasoning: By throwing the bomb out the window and then letting it go off, you still have your characters and their reaction to the explosion (you still have something with which to work).

The main thing I gathered from class this week is that I love hearing people speak about their art almost as much as I love experiencing it myself.

The Player

-- After watching Robert Altman's The Player I felt uneasy. The ending lies somewhere between quaint and grotesque. The very last scene in which Mr. Mill is greeted by a pregnant June Gudmundstottir (his wife) in true American style with June waving over a plethora of flowers as he gets out of the car. They then hug and kiss each other sweetly. You would never suspect that June happened to be the girlfriend of the screenwriter Mill had killed not too long before.

The emphasis on the traditional "happy ending" within the last scene illuminates Altman's view of the audience. He seems to be commenting on the real desires of movies watchers. He spends the entire film building these characters and the story only to end with the murderer not only living happily with his new family but at the peak of his career as well. Everything that we as the audience expect to happen (the bad guy getting caught and paying for his crime, the woman feeling remorse for the death of her boyfriend, etc.) takes a twist. The audience seems to be made fun of for getting so involved with the story and even the characters, because they all turn out to be something else then you originally thought.

One of the most interesting aspects of the movie, in my opinion, is the way power is used--power between the audience and the filmmakers. The audience spends an hour and a half watching a film; they connect to the characters, and begin to predict an outcome before it is over. It's almost as if the audience believes that they have a certain power over the film, in that they came to the conclusion of the story before being shown the ending. The audience figured it out without being told--and in a lot of cases, they do figure it out. The movie delivers. However, in this instance, the filmmakers play into the audience's idea that they could predict the ending and uses that against them. Altman exercises the power to twist the ending in a way the audience doesn't always expect. However, he also gives in the audience's power in a way. Altman creates the happy ending, giving the audience what they think they want--a new, successful family living together amidst flowers and sunshine but at what cost? The murderer goes free.
Who wins? Who has the power now? The audience gets the happy ending they demand but is it really what they wanted?

Donna explained The Player as a movie commenting on movie watchers and what the audience really wants from a film. She brought up the point that Altman wants us to "own up to wanting the happy ending" and knowing this about the audience, he gives us a disturbing ending with a sweet facade.